Medium term rentals vs a long term lease
How a long term lease compares with medium term stays for Toronto owners, weighing income, control, furnishing cost, and temperament.
Fundamentals4 min read
For most Toronto owners, the long term lease is the default choice, and it is easy to see why. You sign once, the rent arrives on the first of the month, and the unit mostly runs itself. That calm is real, and for some owners it is worth what it costs. The trouble is that few owners ever see what it costs written down, and fewer still see the risk that sits quietly inside it.
The alternative is a medium term rental, which means furnished stays of a month or more, usually booked by corporate guests on relocations, projects, and contracts. It tends to earn meaningfully more, it keeps the owner in control of the calendar, and it carries a different risk profile. It also asks for a furnishing budget and, if you run it yourself, a real commitment of time. This note walks through the comparison so you can weigh it honestly.
What each path pays
A long term lease prices the unit at the unfurnished market rate and then freezes that number for the length of the term. If demand rises around the building, the rent does not move with it.
Furnished monthly stays price differently, because the guest is paying for a solved problem: a home that is furnished, equipped, and available exactly when they need it, without a year of commitment. Rates can adjust with demand from season to season and stay to stay. Across the Bbyrent portfolio to date, owners have been paid 1.42 times market rent after fees, and we have written elsewhere about how much more a furnished monthly rental earns. The gap varies by unit and no one should promise you a number, but it is the honest centre of this comparison.
The risk each path carries
The lease looks like the safe option, and most of the time it behaves like one. The exception is the difficult tenancy. In Ontario, when a long term tenancy goes seriously wrong, resolution runs through a tribunal process with long timelines, and the unit can stay occupied while months pass. Owners who have been through it describe feeling trapped in their own property. We have covered why Toronto landlords feel exposed at the LTB separately; the short version is that a lease concentrates risk into one relationship that is hard to exit. This is context for planning, not legal advice.
Medium term stays spread that exposure across many shorter relationships, which changes the shape of the risk rather than removing it. The concerns become vacancy between stays and the quality of each guest. Vacancy is an operations problem, answered with pricing and demand work. Guest quality is a screening problem. Our guests are mostly corporate, screened with AI identity and credit fraud checks, booking history, and pattern recognition, and we have described how serious guest screening works in detail. A vetted guest with an employer and an end date behaves very differently from an anonymous applicant.
Control of the calendar
A lease commits the unit for the full term, and in practice often well beyond it. If you decide to sell, renovate, or move back in, the tenancy sets the schedule rather than you.
Medium term stays are measured in months, so the calendar keeps returning to you. You can plan a sale around a departure date, block time for your own use, or simply stop after a stay ends. In our experience a furnished, show ready home with documented income also presents well to buyers, so keeping the unit earning does not close the door on selling it later.
Furnishing, effort, and temperament
Furnishing is the entry cost. It typically runs $3,500 to $5,000 once, the furniture belongs to you, and in our experience the lift in rent tends to cover the cost within about four months. After that, the furniture is simply an asset that keeps earning.
The larger question is temperament. A lease suits an owner who wants zero decisions and will accept a lower return to get them. Self managing a medium term unit sits at the other extreme, and one of our owners ran a unit capably that way until it became a second job. Managed medium term rental is the middle path. Bbyrent charges 15% of collected rent, bills maintenance and supplies at cost with the receipt shown in the owner app, and handles pricing, screening, cleaning, and guests, so the owner keeps the calm of a lease alongside the earnings of monthly stays. If you want to see what your specific unit would earn on each path, the modelling we run before accepting a property is free, and when the numbers favour a plain lease we say so.
Frequently asked questions
Is a medium term rental more profitable than a long term lease?
Usually, yes, though it depends on the unit and the demand around it. Furnished monthly stays price above the unfurnished market because guests pay for readiness and flexibility. Across our portfolio to date, owners have been paid 1.42 times market rent after fees, but a specific unit should be modelled before anyone quotes you a number.
Can I sell my condo more easily with medium term guests than with a tenant on a lease?
Generally the calendar is friendlier. Stays run in months, so you can plan a listing around a departure date rather than around a tenancy. A furnished, show ready unit with documented income also tends to present well to buyers, which in our experience helps offers rather than hurting them.
Do I have to furnish my unit to rent it medium term?
Yes, medium term guests arrive with suitcases and expect a fully equipped home. Furnishing typically costs $3,500 to $5,000 once, the furniture remains yours, and the higher rent tends to cover that cost within about four months. An unfurnished unit is better suited to a conventional lease.